Quote from: stereotype on August 15, 2013, 09:59:22 AM

Quote from: ffssixtynine on August 15, 2013, 09:54:43 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on August 15, 2013, 09:22:45 AM

Quote from: ffssixtynine on August 15, 2013, 09:10:08 AM

No we do not have any documentation of an agreement with eASIC as you know. All we have is an NDA and that's meaningless. This is why evidence of an actual agreement is so crucial.

So by that same logic, it was a big deal and not merely "symbolic" when Hashfast sent out a press release confirming their deal with ice.drill was complete.

We're striving to set a friendly new tone here in the ACTM threads, but you and Vbs still don't get to have it both ways. Wink

BTW, the 'A' in 'NDA' stands for 'Agreement.' Cheesy

I've not fallen out with you on here, I'm just pointing out that you're not being entirely honest and you have a history of switching around depending what you want shares to do (following your posts elsewhere as well). You also continue to make personal comments as you did with VBS in your previous post. I've don't even think I've commented on your posts before.

A non-disclosure agreement means an agreement not to disclose confidential information. It does not constitute a business relationship of any kind whatsoever. Pointing out the word 'agreement' is being facetious, unless you genuinely don't understand NDAs. I have signed more NDAs than I can shake a stick it - I could have got one with eASIC if I so wished, but it would mean diddly squat in terms of business. eASIC have said nothing whatsoever AFAIK about having a deal with ActiveMining.

So whatever anyone may think of ActiveMining, a press release from eASIC is a very big deal because it confirms the validity of the offering, validity of the claims from a highly respected ASIC specialist company, and establishment of a business relationship. At the moment we only have Ken's word that eASIC have agreed to anything and nothing confirming a business relationship or that payment has been made.

Note that I haven't commented on HashFast at all and I agree with you regarding employee opinion posts being a poor way to judge a company's output. You can only judge on the output, or if employee opinions change significantly over time (which can sometimes signal an upward or downward change in fortunes).

So what could be the reason/s that eASIC have not released a statement?

The NRE probably isnt fully paid as yet