Quote from: chryspano on February 01, 2018, 04:13:38 PM

http://www.capital.gr/bloomberg-view/3270322/to-bitcoin-einai-o-neos-xrusos

http://www.capital.gr/forex/3269963/etaireia-axiologisis-kruptonomismaton-leei-oti-to-ethereum-einai-kalutero-apo-to-bitcoin-kai-to-ripple-na-tin-empisteutoume

Βασικά σε 6 cryptos δίνει καλύτερη βαθμολογία απο το bitcoin ενω σε άλλα 6 την ίδια βαθμολογία με το btc.

και εγώ να είχα κάνει αξιολογήσεις καλύτερα θα τις έκανα. Πάντως για να γνωριζόμαστε στο ποιός είναι o Weiss με τις αξιολογήσεις του... Grin

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2006/ia-2525.pdf

Did they accurately predict the events they claim? Weiss Ratings were accurate during the 1990's, and widely respected through at least 2003, see findings by the United States General Accounting Office in 1994 PDF, that confirm that Weiss Ratings reports on insurance companies, maybe banks too, were more consistently accurate than those produced by the major credit rating agencies e.g. S&P, Moody's, Fitch. There was similar acclaim for Weiss ratings in the late 1990's, until about 2001.
Do the free ratings lists they publish reflect this high level of accuracy? I don't think so, certainly not at the present time. In the past, their ratings were of course fee-based, not free. In fact, the Weiss Ratings website primarily offers fee-based ratings reports now, just as it had been doing in the past. I am not familiar with these new, free investment reports, and they don't seem to be the same as the high-quality fee-based reports associated with Weiss in the past.
Do they appear to give sound advice, now? Well, there were charges filed against Martin Weiss and Larry Edelson by the U.S. SEC, settled in June 2009 PDF, (settlement included return, formally known as "disgorgement" of $2.5 million in investor funds):

πάντως έχεις ένα ταλέντο ρε chryspano και παίρνεις πάντα το μέρος σε απατεώνες βλέπε Ver, Wright, Garzik, Jihan και όλη αυτή η μαφία η ποστάρεις άρθρα από απατεώνες. Φοβερό ταλέντο ρε φίλε Cheesy