Quote from: carlomagno on February 02, 2018, 07:40:21 PM

The concept of premineplus was pioneering. The first swap of a cryptocurrency of which I have proof preminecoin to premineplus

I think some developer can take it back

This coin deserves it and in a group that I built a lot of years ago, people keep contacting me, showing interest

https://github.com/themightyx/premineplus

NXT already exists(ed) is a 100% premined coin and bigger userbase and support. So this idea already happened. But it was initially distributed by a ICO (capped IPO, developer didnt allowed people to spend tons of btc, because the point of it according to him was just to spread ALL the coin using some method, not sell coins for money)

When talking about distributing coins in a fair way, there is clam coin where you get 4.6 clam coin if you had a wallet with more than 0, btc, ltc and doge Y weeks before it was launched (to make sure you know the devs didnt created tons of accounts). The problem is that each block, there is a reward of 1 coins and this reward will always exist so you get 21.73% of how much someone has at the start it block, thats alot of money it makes you 1.26 times richer than a normal person with initial coins with just one block.
So talking about fair distribution (if you exclude clamcoin extra 1 coin per block), premined coin is also not a pioneer.

Monetary inflation (printing more money) sucks (to everyone involved with crypto) so premined coins (where you must still mine and get transaction fees, not ripple bullshit where the owners own most of coins and they distribute as they see fit, so like the state they can print money [up to a limit, but still print money]) is a must. Anyway, premining is just the way crypto should be.