Quote from: rethaw on June 28, 2011, 02:38:08 AM

Quote from: Veldy on June 28, 2011, 02:08:05 AM

Accepted share count exactly matches on each miner to what is shown on Deepbit, so it isn't a big deal; but I would like to know what is causing the extra rejects reported locally only.

Interesting, may be worthy of its own thread.

As far as this modification it is being included in the latest versions of the various miners as far as I know, so you will not have to do this in the future.

I saw that it was committed to the mainline in source control. Such simple things can make significant differences and all add up cumulatively ... the process of performance tuning at it's best

EDIT: Of course, in a short time, everybody picks it up, which drives up the network hash rate and thus the difficulty, so in its way, it is not meaningful once broadly adopted beyond getting a higher work/energy ratio which makes mining more affordable ... keeping some miners online just a bit longer [assuming fixed BTC worth which of course isn't true, but all you can use at any given point in time to determine ROI at any given time].