Quote from: TradeFortress on August 17, 2013, 04:04:20 PM

Quote from: willphase on August 17, 2013, 04:03:05 PM

Quote from: CasinoBit on August 17, 2013, 03:52:22 PM

Quote from: willphase on August 17, 2013, 03:44:34 PM

seems like a catastrophic coding oversight to consider further investments as 'house profit' and credit existing investments. It's now simply a race to see who withdraws their BTC first.

Will

The coding is excellent, we are currently under constant DDoS attacks and have already been asked for ransom in the past, you can check the history of this account.

After the scare we've lost ~100BTC and immediately got an investment for 200BTC from a single user, you can divest if you like, we don't really have any moral obligations to pay the people that really deserve the investments.

I think the analysis above, and just basic math, seems to indicate otherwise. Notice I am being kind by choosing to apply Hanlon's razor; others might not be so generous. I wish you all the best at resolving your DDoS.

Will

Respected member in PM:

Quote

Withraw about 63BTC out of about 43BTC investment. Site says I'm sitting on 85BTC

DDoS does not cause this, shoddy coding does.

Not sure how you got this PM but the 85BTC is profit left on the site after withdrawal.