Quote from: cypherdoc on August 17, 2013, 04:52:51 PM

Quote from: crumbs on August 17, 2013, 04:51:08 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on August 17, 2013, 04:48:53 PM

Quote from: Bitcoinorama on August 17, 2013, 04:47:00 PM

...
Nope, I haven't once 'shilled' KnC here. All I've done is called you Cypherdoc out on your BS when you choose to spread it.

99% of what you do around here is shill for KNC. and the length of time and hours spent are enormous. are you kidding?

ShillFest at HashFast.

remember, the definition of a shill is one who hides the fact that they're a proponent for a company.

that definition only applies to Bitcoinorama.

Pahahaha when have I ever said I'm not pro-KnC? I'm pro Bitfury, I've been pro-Terrahash. I'll happily praise Hashfast if they deliver as promised. It's all there for the taking. I'm not getting paid by any of them. I have a degree of funds tied up in KnC, so obv. I want to see them deliver as promised. That doesn't affect you or Hashfast. Your race is not against KnC, you're not operating in the same timeframe with January. it's against Cointerra and X-Crowd.

You are grasping as straws pal, every company I've declared a scam has been one. 100% record. In my mind the jury is still out in Bitsyncom, but they were def pre-mining, and def had possession of chips in June, but have def been caught red-handed telling porkies. I just don't want to see people get burnt through dishonesty. I'm not saying Hashfast are dishonest, their promises still require meeting, but you clearly are dishonest, by your own admission. So attempting to reason that a means for not accepting a specific payment method because of any potential for abuse in the manner in which you yourself have admitted to is a bit hypocritical to say the least.