Quote from: kano on August 18, 2013, 03:03:11 AM

Quote from: ProfMac on August 18, 2013, 02:29:17 AM

Quote from: Vycid on August 18, 2013, 01:59:41 AM

I agree it is Yifu's fault for acting like 10 weeks was a sure thing. But it's not like he just failed to snap his fingers, like you seem to believe.

Oh man. He missed the part about clicking the ruby red shoes together 3 times.

Lulz, we have a thread full of lap dogs in here.
Trying to make up excuses why Avalon is late and effectively ripped everyone off by selling the chips to someone else.

Most excuse boil down to one of
1) They suck at doing their job ... that they did 2 or 3 times before already .. but screwed up this time - but that's OK be happy with that
2) TSMC looks down on them as a piss ant and don't care (What? You mean Avalon lied about their association?)
3) Anyone arguing against them should be doing the work or sucked in you have to put up with it without saying anything - Avalon is perfect, all the evidence and circumstantial evidence is fake, the sun shines out of Avalon's ass ...

OK for those supposed bright sparks who seem to think they brim with intelligence but lack noting the obvious flaws in their arguments about the difficulty of doing another run ...
When did batch #3 ship? ... need I say more? ...

Nobody is making excuses. Avalon fucked up and that is fact.

The discussion here is "Is Yifu necessarily fraudulent for failing to deliver?". My argument is "no, not necessarily", because the product he is attempting to deliver is much more complicated to produce than people seem to believe. There's a lot of conspiracy theory going on, and I don't think we have the facts.

Yifu could very well be a con artist, but I frankly do not trust this community's assessments. I have observed the insane, near-murderous torch-and-pitchfork responses on these forums several times, and I've learned to place very little confidence in the scam proclamations of our fellow forum-goers.