Quote from: Amaureshands on February 04, 2018, 09:22:14 AM

Quote from: Truthfinder76 on February 04, 2018, 08:37:04 AM

Quote from: buzhdao on February 03, 2018, 09:08:58 PM

Quote from: Vasyafet on February 03, 2018, 04:04:14 PM

Quote from: Bureatonic on February 03, 2018, 03:34:13 PM

Quote from: DroppedM on February 03, 2018, 03:31:35 PM

A good project. But tell me if the business will create many fraudulent accounts in order to generate positive reviews about how this will be fought on the platform?

This is an interesting question. I think the platform will be attended by moderators who will react to this or will be gutted by neural networks like that of the YouTube.

I think they haven't powerful like in youtube so it's ridiculous to compare. Somewhere on this thread community manager already answered this question. They use formulae that not allow to get big reward if you haven't really big part of upvotes, if you make many fake upvotes they will see it.

Maybe they are not so strong but it should work without fraud and cheating. Therefore, it will be necessary to take measures and it is desirable that all these functions are performed by the community.

Of course they should and I think they will. But by community... how on your opinion it should work? If really shit video get big amount of upvotes it clear, but if it contest of two reviews and both of them are good, how you can know where fake votes. I think admins shou do this, they have technical tools for this.

Technically, I do not understand how this will all work, but I think if the video does not violate the law, then it has the right to life. And then let the community decide. If the video shit then it gains a rating, then the community wants to watch shit

Well, the main thing is that it does not spoil the platform rating for new users. On this I think all the same the quality of content should be moderated even if it is a human factor