Quote from: Quickseller on February 04, 2018, 11:03:50 PM

I am interested for Lauda to more specifically address this. Are you going to explicitly deny? Or is there truth to you having a drug addiction?

I am not going to explicitly make any statement until I see at least some reasonable *logs* that need addressing. It is easy to create a contradictory trap and try to find me mentioning (not usage, just the word/discussion) the name of some medicine or illegal drug X time ago. e.g. mentioning/discussing Adderall after watching Mr. Robot.

Quote from: Quickseller on February 04, 2018, 11:03:50 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 04, 2018, 10:20:53 PM

If the accusation turned out to be completely false (i.e. intentionally malicious), would you reveal the source? Just curious.

If in my sole judgment I was fed intentionally inaccurate information, I may consider revealing my source. This would only apply if the information is materially inaccurate.

That isn't sufficient. Why would you protect someone intentionally giving slanderous information?

Quote from: The Pharmacist on February 04, 2018, 11:32:49 PM

You could provide proof, but I don't think it matters anyway.

It's impossible to know whether something like that has been going on since day one or since a random day during my presence here. Assuming I did this and if it were possible to tell, you'd already know that my judgement was compromised and needn't no "source".

Does being addicted to cats count as being an addict Huh