Quote from: Quickseller on February 05, 2018, 02:53:13 AM

Surely this should be very easy for Lauda to dispel this by simply denying that he has a pill addiction. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Lauda would not quickly deny that he is addicted to pills?

Your vendetta just makes you blind and biased. A very characteristic thing of me, which I do via actual communication channels (and not via some fake "sources"), is stating "I can neither confirm nor deny this" (or something similar) to pretty much everything (e.g. do you like XYZ).

Quote from: Quickseller on February 05, 2018, 02:53:13 AM

Instead, Lauda is wanting to know how much evidence there is against him, and wanting to see the evidence that he has an addiction.

There is no evidence; which is why I'm calling you out for it.

Quote from: Quickseller on February 05, 2018, 02:53:13 AM

All while Lauda's "friend" The Pharmacist is backing him, and preemptively saying that Lauda should be in "DT". What do you think this is an indication of?

The Pharmacist, I didn't know we were friends. Good to know I guess Huh

Quote from: Quickseller on February 05, 2018, 03:12:11 AM

No one has claimed to have any evidence to backup that statement, nor have I asked for any evidence to backup this statement.

Let me get this straight; some random baboon told you "Lauda does pills", and you were like "Wow, let me go make a thread!". Seems reasonable. /s

Quote from: Vod on February 05, 2018, 03:15:24 AM

Same thing you are now accusing Lauda of doing...

Hearsay is apparently a very good basis when going after me.