Quote from: bit2255 on February 05, 2018, 01:32:49 PM

Quote from: jeecom on February 05, 2018, 01:07:34 PM

Quote from: Vertflyer on February 05, 2018, 11:44:38 AM

Newbie question. When a block is cracked did others in the pool directly share work to crack that block? Im not sure if block mining is truly distributive, or statistically distributive, as in you only need one machine to find the block, and the more machines the quicker.

My understanding is that each machine is truly independent of each other. The concern I have is that if you have two machines, I don't think they collaborate so they can actually waste effort by trying the same solutions that did not work.

Nicely said!! (All newbies should read this - it might just reduce the number of posts significantly Undecided

)

Mine On!!

I could be completely wrong here, but my understanding is that each miner is given work to do and while that work is independent of everyone else's work, everyone is contributing to finding the solution. That means, even a low hash rate worker has a chance of solving the block. I have always assumed that solving the block was a "brute force" method, so the pool just hands out work to everyone (Here, try this. Now, try this., etc.) The reason larger hash rate miners crack many (most?) of the the blocks is because they can try so many more attempts than a low hash rate miner. However, the attempts that a small miner makes (even if they fail) are still helping the pool because those are attempts that the other miners don't have to make because Everyone gets unique work. Pretty sure Kano can explain this much more accurately.

Edit: To cut to the chase, assuming two pools are run exactly the same (e.g Kano S3 pool and Kano S9 pool) a 100PH pool made up of nothing but miners running S3 rigs, will be just as successful at cracking blocks as the 100PH pool made up of nothing but S9 rigs. (Not talking efficiency here, just block solving capability). Total pool hash rate is what counts, not how you got there.