Quote from: smiba on February 05, 2018, 11:11:16 PM

Quote from: alani123 on February 05, 2018, 11:05:54 PM

The mass production of L1 being canceled doesn't mean that the chip wassn't developed.

Bruh you think they just canceled it because they didn't feel like it? No they canceled the product as it failed horribly ....

Like I said you can't make a scrypt-n asic that is efficient, is fast and has a long lifespan.
Honestly you should be happy if you can get even one of those attributes

Once again I ask you to stay neutral as an OP, its not in your rights to just turn a coin announcement into a SCAM topic. (Do this in the RIGHT subforums!!)
Especially when you only spread FUD based on either totally proven false information or information that has no proof attached with it at all.

It's in my rights to call out incompetent lying developers. You went from denying that scrypt-n ASICs exist to saying they just arren't efficient. Isn't multiple times the efficiency and hashpower of GPUs already enough for you? Are you willing to compromise a coin's immutability over the developer's mistake or deliberate scam to support this narrative?

I get why me calling this a scam would upset you, you mist have invested in your pool and seem annoyed that this coin's mime-potential didn't pay out. I think you should direct your efforts into convincing the developers to pick a different algorithm in a hard for. No-one is going to buy in Garlicoin as long as its running on the broken scrypt-n, no exchange is going to list it etc... Hell, you too should have looked into this before creating a pool! I'll admit that I should have called this project out earlier but at least this thread got enough attention to serve as a fair warning.

To conclude, there's a reason scrypt-n died as a PoW algo in 2014. Garlicoin should fork if it wants to live.