Quote from: Cnote328 on February 07, 2018, 09:26:25 AM

Quote from: gee777 on February 07, 2018, 08:17:11 AM

Quote from: faulerwilli on February 07, 2018, 07:59:56 AM

Quote from: girib1684 on February 07, 2018, 07:01:48 AM

Quote from: ibininja on February 07, 2018, 05:22:15 AM

Quote from: gee777 on February 07, 2018, 04:41:33 AM

Quote from: Cnote328 on February 06, 2018, 11:04:33 PM

Quote from: Ace44 on February 06, 2018, 04:51:23 PM

Quote from: Gunny95 on February 06, 2018, 04:18:45 PM

Quote from: gee777 on February 06, 2018, 02:52:28 PM

Quote from: girib1684 on February 06, 2018, 09:23:13 AM

Guys, look below link and rating. Its seems to be good going...

Savedroid Team is working hardly....

https://cryptogo.de/en/savedroid-cryptocurrencies-for-everyone/

5.9 SCORE
Product6.5
Market5.6
Use of Blockchain3.6
Whitepaper6.4
Roadmap7.6
Business Modell5.9
Team6.8
Token Sale4.6

Status Quo

200k Downloads
10 Million in Transactions
25k+ Telegram
3000+ Twitter
8100+ Facebook
3 Million Funding

This is quite low for a project like savedroid and this might push off potential investors from participating in the main sale

I think you are right but if the investor does a bit research, the person will notice that the review itself contains some errors and should not believe it as absolute truth

I always say DYOR, do your OWN research, information shown on external websites can always have other motives

Yes, i don't base my decision on one review or rating, everyone has their own personal interest , some maybe obscured, how do we even ascertain the credibility of such site, i'm not been biased, just speaking from experience

The rating doesn't reflect well on Savedroid, like you guys mentioned just a single review doesn't define a project, i will love to commend supports, investors and well wishes of Savedroid in here for your positivity

i wont't dispute the fact that you guys are right tho..
but we should heed to the fact that there are a lot of lazy people out there who dont like looking for informations on their own but want to be spoonfed by others and those kind solely rely on site like this to determine what to do and not to?

Agreed on that one; in many posts you it is people using those sites are proof and references in various inquiries. However I still think that those sites (well not all) do it purely for the sake of listing an ICO they do not bother diggin in and really understanding the ICO they are listing; like a genuine review. I think savedroid whitepaper is simple enough.

Agree. Savedroid whitepaper is enough to study. But I mentioned score whatever I found while studying about Savedroid. If you still believe, have more links below with positive reviews :

https://www.trackico.io/ico/savedroid/
4.4 / 5.0

https://icoholder.com/en/ico/savedroid-17375
4.1

https://icobench.com/ico/savedroid
4.1

there you can see it again, there are many pages to rate the ICOs. These three are at least pretty close to each other, so you can assign that to some extent. If I had to evaluate this ICO, the value would probably be somewhere around 4.5 / 5. Maybe I should also open a review page:-)

... Funny
To be frank i don't relate to all these ico rating sites.
There are many of these sites spewing thrash that you don know which of them is legit anymore

Yeah, I prefer following any project I'm interested in via there social media outlets I rarely follow ico rating sites because they can be easily be manipulated in terms of FUD and other factors

This is our own views. But peoples are always checking their rating, reviews and security. Also Project team and theirs previous performance before investing. Might be for some investors this will be helpful. This is my view Grin