There you go again. Instead of explaining why you think I was wrong, you just reuse someone elses ad hominem attack. Not even your own! I thought you told me you were done being an ass.
Anyway, I'm done. I know I am not the only one who is seeing this. I don't understand why, but this seems to be a divisive topic. I have laid it out in every way I know how, you guys are either going to understand what I'm saying or not.
It's not that we don't understand what you are saying. It's that what you are saying is incorrect. Several of us have tried to correct you over the past few pages of this topic. You just refuse to believe that you are anything but 100% correct.
You have a misunderstanding of how mining works and it is clear from reading your posts. You might understand statistics, but you need to stop getting defensive when someone corrects you or questions you.
Also, PMing me saying "sorry I made you feel stupid" is being more of an ass than pointing out that you don't comprehend the fundamentals of how mining work. You didn't make me feel stupid yesterday. You frustrated me because you simply don't understand how difficulty works and are constantly trying to belittle people for not understanding your incorrect logic and analysis. We don't agree with each other and we have both tried to point it out several times. You are still stuck on your averages and "building a share" logic which is just not correct. I'm sorry you cannot see that and that you get upset when people attempt to explain it to you.
Best of luck to ya, mate!
I do understand how mining works, and I know you don't "build" a share. I stated that probability creates the same effect, over time, as if it did work that way. Anytime I said "half a share" I am speaking in a probability sense, not a literal sense.