Quote from: roflwaffle on February 14, 2018, 06:20:36 AM

Quote from: Ned Kelly on February 14, 2018, 05:49:03 AM

I see some contradiction here.

Quote from: roflwaffle on February 14, 2018, 04:38:18 AM

As for fees, someone did the math, and due to the 1000 SEM burn, your asking fee of 1-2% would *never* regain the initial burn, it'd be operating at a loss, even if hardware were free... that seems unreasonable?

Quote from: roflwaffle on February 14, 2018, 04:38:18 AM

Yes, Ted has his money back, but Bill has more still from not running a pool

100% per year is not bad after all.

If you think that's a smart move, then by all means please start a pool @ 1-2%!!

I'll vote 1000 for it.
Cheesy

My suggestion was 3%. And I do not have 1000 to make a delegate. It's not that I do not want. I just don't have this amount of semux. Also, over time market economy will come into a play and greedy pools will be wiped out.