Quote from: justinc2014 on February 14, 2018, 09:30:55 AM

Nico should just come clean he has had made mistakes in his past. Instead of passively posting on twitter news articles about how UK men have been treated badly with past criminal records..

Yeah it is not nice or fair for him, but is it fair for the investor not to be told this in the beginning..

I do not investigate FUD claims as I am not a private crypto currency-detective, but rebuttal would be nice. By not answering correctly gives the sense there are things to be hidden.. To run a project out of twitter like Donald trump is kind of disrespectful to the investors.

I have nothing to gain by the price going down now as I sold out at $45 and do not plan to buy back even if it is at $300 if they are successful.

The reason why debitum is better choice having so many backing services connected to the platform, from insurance, credit risk assessment and debt collectors for sme businesses.
Debitum will partner with any crypto-currency platform that compliments it's platform, seen this in the last week, signing of on a paypie partnership as credit risk assessment on the block chain. that give value to each project..

at ICO price being .12cents for 240 million tokens that makes it a market cap around 29 million when comes to exchange..

populous market around a 1 billion makes PPT around 33X more expensive, with FUD and no MPV as I am aware of lately..
So if populous goes to 2 billion it will make it 66x more expensive then debitum, which is only 100% profit from today prices..

Then really if you want a good lending platform for lending business loans and invoice market "Globally", and see 10x return minimal, then debitum would be the better choice as PPT is way over values and hyped without having a single customer.. when the ICO of debitum is completed it will have first customers coming within a month that have been waiting.

Debitum has it's engines primed for a rocket blast off....

I agree with you that Nico should have been more upfront about everything, but you can't compare Debitum to PPT. They are completely different and Debitum doesn't allow token holders to earn income. Their model is to force vendors to use their token in order to create demand for it. I personally don't like the approach they are taking.