Quote from: canth on August 28, 2013, 11:00:07 PM

Quote from: vandinn on August 28, 2013, 10:28:59 PM

Quote from: tyrion70 on August 23, 2013, 01:51:40 PM

Wow.. Wonder what stripykitteh makes of this..

I think everyone made the same of this: Greg didn't answer your questions because he doesn't care - he got his funds for playing already. I agree with you that some kind of supervision of what's going on in the fund would boost the confidence of investors greatly (there are now people willing to sell at a loss). Dr. got his funds just because he was articulate and sophisticated - but he doesn't need to prove anything to anyone as long as people in Bitcoinland are willing to buy that (risk of not knowing anything). And they were.

I think I am very much on the same page with you. I actually also think the fund can have profits (as long as it focuses on (intra-)day trading rather than actual investments). Unlike you, however, due to this lack of knowledge of what's going on in the fund, I decided to stay away for now.

You seem new to the idea of how hedge funds work - they don't disclose their holdings except when required by the SEC. I think you don't realize that you are exactly the kind of investor that Greg does not want - he doesn't want advice on how to trade or to be asked questions about what his holdings are.

We have invested in a fund that will be traded for profit. If there isn't any profit then it sucks to be us for the losses/opportunity cost and it sucks for Greg since he'll have wasted his time for little payback. I think that the wisest thing that you've done is to steer clear - this investment isn't for you, as it would seem many real world hedge funds aren't either.

Haha, almost as if Greg was talking himself. What I am missing here is the SEC (or any variation of it). I won't comment on the derogatory part of your reply. You can keep that style of communication between Dr. and yourself.