Quote from: Lauda on February 15, 2018, 12:17:16 AM

Quote from: otrkid70 on February 15, 2018, 12:11:17 AM

99% Eh? I do Question that and i wish there were a way to look at your feedback history prior to Editing.

"Prior to editing"? This is very backwards. Are you saying, ratings that were left mistakenly or incorrectly described should not be edited? Most of my ratings represent the following groups: a) Abusers from the alts thread. b) Account traders. c) ICO bumpers. d) Individual scammers. Those are naturally correct (with the exception of the last one, where errors could be made). The rest represents a minor amount of left ratings, thus the rate of invalid ratings can never be high.

Quote from: otrkid70 on February 15, 2018, 12:11:17 AM

BS= Spam and garbage + Less moderation.

You want less spam and less moderation?

Quote from: otrkid70 on February 15, 2018, 12:11:17 AM

I have spoken about some publicly. Named them and called them out.

Where and who?

Quote from: owlcatz on February 15, 2018, 12:06:57 AM

Yeah, hopefully Tomatocage, who is clearly owned by a certain butthurt scammer called quickscammer or Ognasty (Or both).... Roll Eyes

I wonder if TC will neg. you for this, and if he does whether otrkid70 will complain about that abuse or keep quiet (and complain about non-existing abuse from others). Roll Eyes

I was pointing out the BS of not having enough moderation.

You and a few others...Like i said i don't want to start a war with you or anyone else.

I doubt TC would neg me. he had the opportunity to neg me when i asked for a Loan with no collateral for my dogs operation years ago. He among other scrutinized me and asked for proof so i showed proof.