Quote from: jannoi on February 15, 2018, 02:57:12 AM

Quote from: jlaranjeiro on February 14, 2018, 03:57:30 PM

Quote from: Mark_l on February 14, 2018, 02:55:58 PM

Seeing as we are ALL using the same miner for this coin, the fact that it is a bit inefficient doesn't matter to much. We are all using a little more power than we need too and we are all hasing at a sub-optimal rate. The % split of rewards is therefore exactly the same as if the miner was 100% efficient. It's a wonderful, beautiful and all around amazing level playing field at the moment Grin

And, if I understand this correctly, as long as the difficulty is >1 then the chain has more hasing power than it needs so an extra few % right now from each miner doesnt really matter to much (<- please correct me on this)

No, you are right, I just want to point that in future 10 or 20 Watts/hour more could be a big diference, for those who are mining.

If a new miner is actually coming if I may I would also to add some features if possible:

- Hash rate ( instant and last 1 minute and 15 minutes)
- Number of found blocks
- Number of rejected blocks
- ping time
(for me this are the most important, but if you want to add more information, I am not against !)

Noted
And yes, power efficiency is important.

Quote from: Mark_l on February 14, 2018, 11:46:21 PM

+ The ability to set CPU core affinity Grin

You can set the number of threads with --threads [number]

Glad to hear a new release is on its way. I am having trouble with the DB, it takes hours to rebuild. Last time, the daemon lasted just about an hour after rebuilding the DB on one machine. Though the other machine ran +24h without issues.

If it is technically feasible at the moment, I suggest a miner build into a wallet, it has some advantages. I think it would also best suit your reward structure (1.9+1) and spread the hashrate, especially if you add mobile wallets. The wallet/miner from coinage looks promising although they are in a very early stage, too.