Quote from: ingo49 on February 15, 2018, 03:25:47 PM

Quote from: traumschiff on February 15, 2018, 09:16:05 AM

Wrote an article regarding the airdrop and the risks of it hurting the main chain's anonymity: link

Seems like the issues were not taken care of as the original distribution plan was kept.

I read this and it is somewhat one-sided.
What about the issues raised by xmv being a good thing, exposing a basic flaw with monero?

Except the same flaw will exist with MoneroV aswell if someone decides to airdrop a MoneroX on MoneroV. As they didn't do anything to adress the "flaw", why would you support a project that shows a flaw and is unable to fix it? They even go as far as use the Monero name and ignore the things that Monero developers asked in the twitter quote from the article. Building fundamentals on destroying the parent chain's anonymity while you don't have a fix for it? Didn't intend to scare people away from the project, but you should really think further.