Quote from: kola-schaar on February 15, 2018, 07:19:03 PM

Quote from: ByteFan on February 15, 2018, 04:10:37 PM

Quote from: IckyYak22871 on February 15, 2018, 03:13:32 PM

Quote from: ByteFan on February 15, 2018, 02:31:16 PM

Byteball stress test article on Medium

https://medium.com/@prat486/byteball-main-net-under-stress-test-c131ba85b72b

Very good job! By the way, the table which compares performance of different blockchains is wrong in your article. Graphene, on top of which steem is built, is able to handle thousands of tps, and at least several other blockchains too (https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@cyberblock/top-9-market-cap-blockchains-ranked-in-order-by-transaction-speed-lets-see-where-steem-fits-in). Also, graphene transactions are confirmed in few seconds. This makes byteball to look very poor in comparison. Performance and scalability of byteball should definitely be addressed.

I am ready to amend my article but I would like others third party figures. Can others guys can make comment about effective tps on *LIVE WORKING* networks. Thx.
Also the article is open for comments on Medium.

THX, excellent work should be rewarded

- peering code for donation needed..

Thank you. Feel welcome to push a donation to any of the donation addresses mentioned in the paper:

To show your support consider an anonymous donationby by throwing:
a few GBytes at VXPRGNFBEWXTA7LH7CB23TIDP2NXO3AZ
or a few BTCs at 1292iSvBFXMHWbEdjCZyMMBcgufRLj9NEp
or a few BCHs at qqx8ecnlfzcpzjht7k5hkld6kj3242cwwg2tjf22qz
or a few ETHs at 0x5b5963a4F62CED34cBE22Ab85fAa1DB1FaCE2665