A friend of a friend reliable unidentified source said that an unidentified individual close to you/Lauda said that youre the same person.
A 
On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet,
But as you know, I've denied being Lauda--explicitly. So if you're convinced that I'm Lauda then Lauda has denied it. Or do you absolutely need this to be addressed from the account whose user id is Lauda? It kinda makes me think you don't even believe your own bullshit. On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public. In the US court system, the accused will first either plead guilty or not guilty before they are tried, and get to see evidence against them, and I do not see any other reason why I would be obligated to allow him to see evidence against him before he makes his position on this clear. This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.
He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.Lauda, you are one of the most trusted users on this forum. I myself would trust you with my lifes savings. I will also trust your sage advice.
Thanks. Stay vigilant. Please advise. Help me, Lauda. I am beginning to lose confidence in myself.
Step 1) Start tagging account traders. Step 2) Start tagging abusers (i.e. abusive account farmers). Step 3) Voila. You've severely impacted Quickscammer's business and thus are on his list of evil users.