Quote from: Lauda on February 17, 2018, 10:13:42 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on February 17, 2018, 10:01:58 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 17, 2018, 07:35:31 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on February 17, 2018, 07:04:02 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on January 30, 2018, 04:49:48 PM

You people need to grow up. Tossing out scam accusations just because you are butthurt over a tag given to you. If you feel the tag was given in error, then contact the person whom tagged you and try to work it out. No amount of bullshit threads will help you.

And just an FYI, I am a competitor of Laudas and I do just fine. I would also trust Lauda to hold any amount of funds for myself or a project if they asked for an escrow, so your argument of Lauda is tagging all competitors is FALSE.

If you are following the rules of the forum and doing things as they should be done, you will have no problems with Lauda or any other of us DT users. Just common sense

Really?

I have been silent on this for too long. I also have problems with this syndicate of trust abusers. It's been going on for too long now. They use shills and sock puppets to discredit their competitors reputations while boosting the reputation of their own syndicate. In today's BTC value, I have lost over $70,000 to scammers through campaigns this group has managed, yet my reputation has been painted red while their reputations continue to move up in status. It's absurd! I have been resigned to take my losses, but they are becoming significant enough now for me to consider judicial remedies of retrieval....This has to stop!

Are you trying to state that I'm a scammer? Please clarify.

I have no evidence of you personally scamming anybody....However, there is plenty of circumstantial evidence regarding the issue of "trust abuse" surrounding the reputation network that supports your position. I am not here to accuse anybody ---> I am simply pointing out that the trust abuse needs to stop ---> My comment was a just a response to Yahoo's comment for which he may have some personal insight. My main complaint is that there have been plenty of highly questionable events that have received no reputation demerits, while at the same time there has been a practice of ruining other user's reputations for extremely minor nuances. The big question is thus: why does a small group of associated members, many of which have been involved in seriously negative events, have green trust, while a much larger base of members, whom have not been involved in any scams whatsoever, have red trust? Isn't there something wrong with that correlation?

Again, I am not accusing anybody of a scam, but I am claiming that trust abuse is a serious concern.

Well, the thread is about me thus my previous question. You said you'd lost over $70k to scammers. Elaborate?

Lauda, everything doesn't have to be about you! (SMILE) To be clear, I have lost much more than that on the forum....that's just the amount (7+ bitcoin) I've lost participating in specific campaigns promoted by campaign managers with green trust (who I do not blame) who's participating members, however, marked my trust red for merely wearing a competitive campaign's signature. Trust abuse ---> by members who are also in your support network. That's all. The trust abuse is very corrosive and it needs to be exposed.