Quote from: scam_detector on February 28, 2018, 02:12:20 AM

Quote from: nullius on February 17, 2018, 10:10:23 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on February 17, 2018, 09:09:26 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on February 17, 2018, 05:46:11 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 17, 2018, 05:27:09 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 17, 2018, 03:29:54 PM

nullius is lauda. That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.

Given the advanced cryptography knowledge (among other things) shown by nullius, I take this as a compliment. I assume that you have proof for this accusation? :)

Did you have a cat named Alia and did you grow up on Armelle street? I'm sure this is the missing link.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2837197.msg29420977#msg29420977 :D

Well, proves my point even worse than I expected: Mr. Nasty will go pick on a woman, because hes too much of a snivelling poltroon to take a shot at me. Disgusting.

This is the level of impotent prick who gets the tar beaten out of him by a strip club bouncer after trying to stiff one of the ladiesfor either plausible definition of the word stiff.

Given that sort of character, its no wonder that women must dislike him so much that he feels an urgent need to go around posturing with the stink of desperation to pretend hes a Real Man. Protip: Real Men never do thatexcept when theyre mocking and quasi-satirizing a wannabe such as Mr. Nasty.

For those who dont know who Alia is, shes a 19-year-old camgirl (/u/GirlsGoneBitcoin verified by theymos) who so happens to like me. (Or per my trust page...) My first-ever contact with her occured just yesterday, in public. She has no direct involvement in this matter. For Mr. Nasty to take a shot at her in lieu of me is the single most contemptible thing Ive seen today in a thread which is a creepy horror-show of contemptible things. Though Id still call him Quicksellers soul-brother, Im no longer sure which of them is worse.

Maybe I misunderstood it, but honestly I did not feel like reading the linked thread and I assumed that you really met her. Since I have no time and no desire to read through the linked thread, I now assume that you did not mean it. If that is the case, I apologize!

As I have said many times. I am only concerned with the two persons mentioned in the OP!

Ah. Correct hermeneutical reading of this text should be settled by the fact that the words just yesterday, in public were hyperlinked to the post whereby I made first contact in full public view of the whole forum. That post was an open letter to Alia. The next post in the thread was Alias reply to it. To set this now in virtual stone:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180228021905/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2846629.msg30424698#msg30424698

First rule of scam detecting: Get the evidence. Seriously, did not feel like clicking on a hyperlink?

Now, I see roughly four remaining divergent issues in this thread:

The control of accounts #1764044 alia and #974658 favours. IP evidence is damning, but has been challenged. Outweighing IP evidence would be a hefty task, and quite a surprise to most people here. theymos suggestion would fully settle the matter, if it were to actually occur.
The propriety of offering for sale of gambling scripts and of claims made about them. As Ive said, I lack sufficient knowledge to make a judgment therebut I do trust RGBKeys technical judgment.
Involvement by aTriz with the preceding item. This looks to me like a case of technical ignorance. It seems more an accusation that aTriz got scammed than that he scammed anybody. Obviously, this point hinges entirely on the preceding.
Some vague claim that aTriz did wrong with that 3-year contract. I have not seen a precise accusation specified, let alone supported by evidence.

I hope that helps avoid conflation of issues and sort out remaining factual questions. I repeat again to all parties: My sole concern is the truth. I am zealous about that.