Quote from: Balthazar on September 01, 2013, 12:21:12 PM

Quote from: 1PFYcabWEwZFm2Ez5LGTx3ftz on August 31, 2013, 06:49:55 PM

If the network had a way of knowing this, then this masternode would not be necessary at all. The masternode serves as a "trusted party" - the network trusts the masternode, so if the attacker gained control of the masternode, then how would the network know that the control of the masternode was overtaken?

There is a checkpoints chain. All checkpoints MUST follow this chain without exceptions, and even key owner can't violate this rule.

P.S. How much times can you ask the same questions? Read the topic and commit description.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=282314.msg3042252#msg3042252
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=282314.msg3022480#msg3022480

I've seen read some of your other posts, and they seem pretty well stated. Can you let me know what affiliation you have in FTC (if any)? I do appreciate your posts on the topic, and would love to believe they are not biased in any way, which I think might be the case.