Quote from: Nathan01 on February 19, 2018, 07:37:28 AM

Quote from: Hendobox on February 18, 2018, 08:33:42 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on February 18, 2018, 08:15:22 PM

Quote from: Hendobox on February 18, 2018, 07:17:03 PM

Quote from: Owillz on February 18, 2018, 03:31:48 PM

Quote from: Hendobox on February 18, 2018, 12:06:42 PM

Frankly speaking, I already have a great portfolio and profit from start ups of various projects, but I know this project will get me something big. I was also fascinated when I first saw their site and went through their idea. It is really good.

It's never too much to add up for tokens to our portfolio friend. Get as much as you can from this and from future projects. You can't tell which might turn out to be the next bitcoin

You are very correct my friend. With all the prospects and support this project has gotten so far, only a blind man will take no action. As a matter of fact, this project also has prospects for the long term run so it could just be the next Bitcoin as you've pointed out 😁

A blind man will take action when he have a sound financial advisor by his side to TELL him about luxcess project, I kind of don't understand why someone should be giving a negative review about the project and advising other investors not to participate when the team has been transparent as possible

Notwithstanding I like Luxcess-group to deal with those dust raised earlier by that "ICO-analyst" to further prove their transparency once more to the community

Nobody is making a negative review about this project my friend. Perhaps you misunderstood the interpretation. I simply meant the project is too good to be ignored and only someone without good investment insights would ignore this project. I also agree with you in terms of the dust raised by "ICO-analyst." I think clearing the air will mean a great deal for us as a matter of fact

OK thank you for making your point clearer, I was tagging the review of ICO-analyst as being negative especially when there has been no statement from the Luxcess-group themselves disapproving or approving his point and there was hasty conclusions in the criticism in the end but not yours or anyone here... No misunderstanding from my part mate, believe me none Huh

Like you said let's await the response of the team and I hope Luxcess-group is paying attention to this question from their end

I was actually following ico-analyst to get his point because he started well as a critic but it turns out his motives were biased, is basically a good thing to actually hear from the actual team, even they they did, his assumptions were already concluded, that's not constructive at all, we don't have to be judgmental by listening to one part of a story