Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on February 18, 2018, 11:38:01 PM

Quote from: Ibian on February 18, 2018, 11:34:47 PM

Quote from: Ibian on February 18, 2018, 11:21:00 PM

Quote from: xhomerx10 on February 18, 2018, 11:19:46 PM

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on February 18, 2018, 11:10:04 PM

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 18, 2018, 10:59:11 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference. These are little people not lines on graphs.

Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?

I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

You are calling women objects there. Might want to check your male privilege.

Hey. Hey don't run off. This is serious. If a feminist saw what you just posted, they would dox you and get you fired. You better disavow yourself while you still have the chance.

(i'm not a feminist. don't worry, i wouldn't even dox you mate. just do the right thing.)

Hey I dunno what ya'll are talking about... but...Holy shit. When did the Wall observer turn in to RadHub?

Hey yea bro... I for one know the courts are anti-male. But Dunno who you are bro cuz there are so many re-quotes.. Cheesy