Alia also replied to poGium shortly before I managed to make my thread transplant post. I here reply to her, again omitting nothing from the quoted post. To make clear the context, I have here fixed attribution of her quotes of poGium.

Quote from: alia on February 19, 2018, 10:48:29 AM

You are a chronic word-twister.

I noticed that about him.

Quote from: alia on February 19, 2018, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: poGium on February 19, 2018, 08:15:22 AM

In her thread she has written that cheating is only bad when the other person finds out.

My exact words regarding cheating were "I don't condone cheating". The act of cheating is usually physical romance or sexual activities between one person within and one person outside of a relationship. Watching a girl on a screen is akin to porn, and to me, is thus not cheating. If your girlfriend thinks watching porn is cheating, then you have a very abusive, and frankly, shitty relationship.

Well, Alia, since I dont cheat, I hope you are amenable to what I said above about monogyny. ;-)

Quote from: alia on February 19, 2018, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: poGium on February 19, 2018, 08:15:22 AM

In addition, theymos writes that you should give sMerits to posts that have an objectively high quality

Another lie. theymos's exact words are "I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality". Don't bullshit us when the facts are right there in front of us.

(I already covered this, unbeknownst to Alia, whilst she was replying unbeknownst to me. I would ordinary snip this. Since this is a thread transplant, I quote for context.)

Quote from: alia on February 19, 2018, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: poGium on February 19, 2018, 08:15:22 AM

And now we look at this post. Did you give a sMerit here because it shows a high quality or because you (as always, it is ONLY nullius) agree?

He probably merited me for reiterating something so glaringly obvious, that a seemingly smart individual like you doesn't seem to understand. Can you prove that God does not exist? Can you prove that unicorns aren't hiding in my underwear? Jesus.

Actually, in this case, I was being slightly ironic. It is generally true that a negative cannot be proved, in the sense of the example you just gave. But in certain particular situations, a negative can be proved to an adequate standard of evidence. That is why the propositions of nullius = Lauda, nullius = Satoshi, nullius = alia are all absurd to the point of comedy!

For the proposition that nullius = alia to hold true, then someone who is /r/GirlsGoneBitcoin verified by theymos to look like this:

...would need to have and be capable of all the characteristics of my persona, and all the characteristics of your personaand must be capable of an almost superhuman task of switching writing styles and personalities on the fly.

The proper Internet terminology is, LOL.

Quote from: alia on February 19, 2018, 10:48:29 AM

I don't merit nullius because he is my friend, which he is. I merit him because his posts can be hilarious, informative, sexy and high-quality. I'm not the only one who feels this way (he's already one of the top-ranked merit receivers on the forum). Our very first communication ever was a post he made on my thread, and if you read it, you'll understand why I see him as so merit-worthy. There's no need to make up conspiracy theories - I suggest you get out there and make some friends yourself.

Well said. Though your proposition that I am sexy could also use some proofs between us, here omitted because I decided to edit out the [NSFW] subject marker Id edited in. Do you wish for me to make an object demonstration on you in private, or later publicly on in our Ciphersex 101 [NSFW] thread? Perhaps both!