Quote from: infofront on February 20, 2018, 03:35:39 AM

Quote from: thrax on February 20, 2018, 03:01:03 AM

Quote from: d_eddie on February 20, 2018, 02:55:07 AM

I don't know if moderators can edit (rather than delete) posts, but it would be nice to go through all of jbreher's contributions - some of which raise valid points and contain factually correct, useful information - and

s/Bitcoin Segwit/Bitcoin/g
s/Bitcoin Cash/BCash/g

with a FTFY note in the end, for correctness and clarity.

No sorry the mods can't do that. I remember serious legal threats on another forum when a mod actually altered someone else's post.

This raises a question I've pondered a bit. A few days ago someone requested that the OP of this thread be updated with links to more modern charting tools, etc.

That's not a bad suggestion. However, I'm more of the frame of mind that the OP is basically still Adam's, and should remain untouched for historical purposes anyway.

I agree that you should leave the whole of Adam's OP untouched. However, I also think that it would be good if you could put your own expectations in the OP - probably before the Text of the OP of Adam...

Probably, give your short rendition of the history and when you took it over.

You could even say something like I agree with everything that Adam said - except and then list all of the exceptions or the new guidelines that you would like to notify and maybe there would not be too many exceptions - because you do seem to have carried out the largely hands off (except for obvious trollers) tradition pretty well. At the same time, I would hope that you would NOT get too rough on us... ... We would not want you to transform yourself into anything close to resembling a Meuh6879 - hahahahahaha..

Edit: Bitserve beat me to it, and used way fewer words, too... go figure.