Quote from: Gelbstich on February 20, 2018, 10:00:16 AM

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on February 19, 2018, 03:41:30 PM

Quote from: Gelbstich on February 19, 2018, 03:30:56 PM

Can you please take a stand towards these accusations?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2389238.0

There's a project that essentially copied Blocklancer that turned out to be a scam (Coinlancer), where the dev team is holding something like 90% of the total coin supply, has a disproportionate amount of (fake) "advisors" (which you will never see in any real venture), lied about how much money they raised, refused to show their holdings, lied about their team members, spammed their own thread with sock puppet posts, repeatedly ignored and/or dodged technical and other critical questions about their "project", censored critical inquiry on their Telegram, and just up and vanished into thin air after the ICO.

The thread that you've linked was posted by a sock puppet created by said scammers.

If you check his post history and timeline you'll find that the account was created solely as an attempt at defamation as a retort of me exposing all the red flags regarding CL in their ANN.
They falsely assumed that I was a part of the Blocklancer team, while I just exposed a scam like I'd usually would (refer to my post history to see that I regularly expose scams of different types when I come across them) and hence tried to attack this team as a result.

If you actually take apart the thread that he posted you should quickly see that it's a bunch of pointless accusations that are fully devoid of an understanding of corporate reality. Not to mention that resources are allocated within market standards. If the reasoning that this scammer provided was true that would turn not just every single ICO, but also every single traditional venture into a scam. And the facts are clearly aligned against his case.

Edit: I recommend reading the Whitepaper and the Yellowpaper (rigorous technical paper) if you're still in doubt. Both of which are far beyond market standards. And I don't mean from a writing perspective (the English isn't flawless), but from a content perspective. It's immediately apparent that this team has conducted extremely thorough qualitative and quantitative market research and successfully identified and addressed problems with the industry.

Thank you for taking a stand. I will read the whitepaper of Blocklancer as suggested. At the first view Blocklancer seems to have a good business model.

At second glance it looks even better. Especially if you compare it to the similar projects of which one was a scam, and the other is neither user-friendly nor does it have the dispute tribunal that Blocklancer has which incentivizes token holders to help the platform flourish.