Quote from: suchmoon on February 20, 2018, 03:37:07 PM

~
I see QS has updated the title of the thread: "... 100 people excluded lauda", which brings all sorts of philosophical questions, e.g. are forum sockpuppets "people"?

The majority of those are probably just random newbie scammers Lauda has marked and they have reciprocated for no other standpoint.

Quote from: Hhampuz on February 20, 2018, 01:29:24 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 20, 2018, 01:25:51 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 20, 2018, 08:07:09 AM

Quote from: ibminer on February 20, 2018, 08:04:22 AM

Quote from: ibminer on February 18, 2018, 05:31:59 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 16, 2018, 10:04:43 AM

--snip--
This does not rely upon any confidential sources, so I can share what I have provided confidentiality is promised.

--snip--
I'd love to see the evidence and certainly would provide confidentiality. Keep in mind, I seek truth.

Is it safe to assume I will not be seeing any evidence of the Lauda alts?

Isn't it obvious and expected that he does not? As usual, he made the whole thing up.

Quote from: Lauda on February 16, 2018, 09:55:26 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 16, 2018, 10:04:43 AM

On that topic, I am fairly confident that lauda has used sockpuppets in this very thread to back his arguments. I believe one of these to be The Pharmacist, however lauda has not responded to this accusation yet, so I do not want to make the evidence I have of this public.

He claims he has evidence. I do not see evidence after you've explicitly denied this.

Lauda likes to imply that he has denied things that he very clearly did not deny. This is extremely dishonest, and likely plays a part as to why nearly 100 people have specifically excluded lauda from their trust lists.

Nice trust!

Mine says -241, not the -9999 (just saying)