Quote from: max.trekker on February 20, 2018, 07:31:29 PM

Quote from: Turing on February 20, 2018, 07:14:11 PM

Quote from: max.trekker on February 20, 2018, 06:53:06 PM

Quote from: MaGNeT on February 20, 2018, 05:38:55 PM

If the Waves team airdrops 100 BCH it will be ~ 0.00001 BCH for 1 WCT.

Hopefully they will airdrop more this time. However i think you are a bit wrong in your calculations. I hope the 'bch' in address stunt was made to maybe exclude their own address as well as some exchanges addresses from the airdrop. Airdropping to themselves and to exchanges doesn't make much sense imo. However the biggest WCT holder changed their address to a bch one, maybe that was Waves's address.

I have seen about 1m WCT who is not owned by an address with BCH in it so probably your calculations are a bit off with the "100 BCH it will be ~ 0.00001 BCH part".

http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/DHgwrRvVyqJsepd32YbBqUeDH4GJ1N984X8QoekjgH8J

No address holding 1M, the largest holder has 835465.92 WCT

I ment aggregated balances not a single holder.

In fact: for the riches 332 addresses there are ~4m which is not held in an address with b & c & h in it, so if they are not moved there are at least 4m which will not receive BCH from the airdrop.

Thanks! I misread it.