Quote from: Frickeladm on February 21, 2018, 08:04:59 AM

Quote from: PS92 on February 21, 2018, 01:06:10 AM

Quote from: Frank37 on February 19, 2018, 11:50:05 PM

Quote from: PS92 on February 19, 2018, 11:26:52 PM

Quote from: FaucetKING on February 19, 2018, 05:41:20 AM

The idea is just brilliant ! Only the baddest thing is the 'Flix' at the end of the name, was it necessary because we doesn't need Netflix V2 !
But in general, i like the idea and the concept, this token might fly as soon as there's a working project available, well, good luck with that !

My thought exactly!!! Why the fuck would you name yourself like your biggest competitor? It's a bit like those shitty ripoff movies that go straight to dvd right after a major hollywood blockbuster comes out. You can't take them serious if they don't take themselves serious and with an own identity.

Maybe it was a funny idea in the beginning and now it is to late for a change.
But maybe it is a fight announcement

, its very offensive if you use a common name and put crypto in front of.
There are other sites with "known" names out there: youporn, dtube ...

True, but they're at least in a different industry.

And it is ofcourse not too late to change. Think Neo, Nano etc

Well its defining its core in the name. I dont get why you want to change that. That name tells me immediatly what its about and I'm more interested
to look up how it will work. Crypto - for the blockchain and flix for the movies. Neo (new) or nano (small) I find rather non-engaging because that has been
used to describe bullshit in the 1990s.
If, maybe go more in the direction of BlockBuster, ChainView, MovieChain... that would be more descriptive.

I also don't understand why people don't like the name of this project. I am sure that the project management has been thinking about the name for a long time and has put some sense into this name!