Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: TheButterZone trust abuse and hostile auction conditions
by
EcuaMobi
on 21/02/2018, 04:09:33 UTC
Congrats, (...?) on everything except the actual term OP Ggddtt violated
So you agree on the other points?

This:

Proof of funds can be given to trusted escrow.  

violated this:

Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)
...
  • No terms or conditions (including by any other name) may be proposed or demanded (including by any other name) by any bidder.

So? Maybe it violated a local rule of yours, but it wasn't a scam attempt or produced any loss of money.
Asking to get a trusted escrow involved is actually trustworthy. What could deserve negative trust is refusing.
In any case, what we're discussing here is whether there was a scam attempt and, therefore, negative trust was deserved.



I didn't say force. But me & countless others who bought into that advocacy in various posts did commit that economic suicide, and lost untold millions if not billions in USD-equivalent BTC as a result. So fuck all of us AGAIN, and ONLY, for falling victim to shills? No, fuck the shills by every legal means necessary.
Again, if they're not forcing you to anything (which you agree they're not doing) then they're not scamming.



Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
You explicitly spam-posted this on my profile:
Quote
I negatively rated them because I strongly believe that each of those terms violators were running a "scam"
That doesn't make sense. They're not scamming and you know it. Don't try using SaltySpitoon's quote to try and justify your actions.



Your wrongful interpretation of everything as a scam attempt is even more strange because most of your overpriced auctions and offers really look like jokes/trolling so joking replies would seem welcome. I posted once in one of your threads truly convinced it was a joke, but now I think you actually may have been trying to be serious!
Not everything, nor overpriced compared to contemporaneous market prices.
Not everything, agreed and sorry for the generalization. But a lot of things which are actually not scam attempts.
And several threads of yours are definitely overpriced compared to rational market prices. Several of your threads do seem like jokes/trolling.



Edit:
I'll stop feeding the troll now. Fortunately your trust is now ignored by everyone, it's been proven your actions are wrong, and you keep trolling instead of posting objectively, so it's not worth wasting my time anymore.