Quote from: Dalba on February 21, 2018, 03:50:10 PM

Quote from: eminer001 on February 21, 2018, 12:17:27 PM

Is Patrike alive ? It seems other software will soon be better than Awesome Miner if AM is not maintained and improved every day.

I strongly advise that AM should have an option for "precise benchmark" that should also test various intensity settings for each GPU and each mining software and save them. Right now AM leaves intensity settings to default miner's values that results in 20% lower income from the miners just because of lacking the usage of the intensity with the best results.

What news do we have about better results with pool statistics to avoid issues with spikes ?

BTW, did you see the features other software offers that is missing from AwesomeMiner ?
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.5

NemosMiner
Uses calculations based on 24hractual and currentestimate ahashpool prices to get more realistic estimate.
  Includes some trust index based on past 1hr currentestimate variation from 24hr.
  AND is NOT sensible to spikes.
  This shows less switching than following Current Estimate and more switching that following the 24hr Actual.
  Better profitability.

I agree with you on those suggestions. I dream of a precise benchmark that would do as follow :
- For each algorithm, test all compatible software and select the best one as the one to use ! For example an equihash test on nvidia card would select the best software between ccminer, EWBF and DSTM.
- Once the software is selected, then make another test to determine for each algorithm what would be the best intensity.

On top of that, if AM would be able to make similar profit calculations as Nemosminer can do, we could have the best managing sofware for miners !

I agree, this would be AWESOME