Quote from: Vbs on September 05, 2013, 12:54:12 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 05, 2013, 12:43:05 AM

Quote from: Vbs on September 05, 2013, 12:28:19 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on September 04, 2013, 11:57:12 PM

Well sure, but eASIC had already published a signed letter confirming the deal with ACTM too, so a PR on eASIC's website likewise carries almost no weight.

No, eAsic didn't publish any signed letter and didn't confirm any deal before today.

Yes they did, it's in the FAQ.

Quote from: kslaughter on July 08, 2013, 10:47:13 PM

ActiveMining F.A.Q.

Can you please provide some documents as proof of the existing claims?

eASIC chip NDA: http://axs.net/AMC/eAsic-NDA0001.jpg and http://axs.net/AMC/eAsic-NDA0002.jpg

That's just a generic NDA, doesn't specify any deal being done. Today was the official release of the VMC/eAsic deal: http://www.easic.com/vmc-uses-easic-to-achieve-24-756-ths-bitcoin-miner/

Very different from the HashFast/Uniquify case: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.0 (signed letter from Uniquify about the chip development, dated July 24, 2013), while the official PR on Uniquify's website was published 20 days later, on August 13, 2013.

The 'A' in NDA stands for 'Agreement.' Roll Eyes

The market has known about an ACTM/eASIC agreement for a long time. Ken's meeting with them was long, long ago.

That's why the rally today was so brief. There was no new information in the press release, just a rehash of old stuff.