Quote from: bigrcanada1 on February 23, 2018, 05:13:05 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 23, 2018, 02:25:30 AM

Quote from: bigrcanada1 on February 23, 2018, 01:44:31 AM

Who cares about this loser anyway. It's had no effect on our growth and adoption and frankly pretty pathetic. We'll keep him in our sand box. Certainly it's now proven he's invested in DASH...and couple of us are zeroing in on where he is... Wink

It's also come to my attention that he is also a Masternode owner. This is revealing... There is a connection here that. We are trying to get to the bottom of... And we'll keep digging.

Remember Icey... Money can buy information and the corrupt can be bought! Kiss

What does this mean? First you say "who cares about this loser" and then brag about how you are stalking and doxing me? That doesn't make sense.

Please stay on topic, which is Dash, and stop breaking the forum rules (not to mention federal/state laws) against stalking and doxing (and buying private information from "the corrupt").

You obviously have a lot of big fat assets to lose should anything bad happen to me as a result of your "zeroing in" on my location. I don't want your HYIP Masternodes (too much liability for money laundering and unregistered money services) but will be coming for the Misconduct winery/vineyard/restaurant if you give me a good reason.

Quote from: http://www.forgetthebox.net/putting-doxers-in-the-dock-how-canadian-law-punishes-online-offenders-201610181/

Though Canada has no specific law criminalizing doxing, our existing laws fill this void just fine when you think about what the act entails.

People post home addresses, phone numbers, credit card information, and private email addresses with the intent that someone other than them will see it and steal, harass, and threaten death, rape, or worse.

Fortunately, in Canada we have section twenty two of the Criminal Code which says that anyone who counsels someone to commit an offense is considered party to said offense. That means that if you encourage someone to commit a crime, you are considered as guilty of the crime as the person who actually did it even if they did it in a way other than the one you recommended. That also means that you are subject to the exact same penalties.

Lets say you post a womans home address on social media and say that she should be raped. That night someone sees your post and goes and rapes her. If the rapist convinces the authorities that they got the idea from your social media feed, you might be charged with rape and face the same five or fourteen year prison sentence (depending on the degree of violence involved) as the rapist.

If you post a persons private email address and phone number and encourage your followers to make death threats, rape threats, or threats of bodily harm, and they do it, youll be looking at the same eighteen months to five years as the people making the threats.

In order to get the same penalty, the prosecution would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you actively and willfully sought to encourage people to commit the crime and that you knew or ought to have known that a crime was likely to be committed as a result of your encouragement.

There is no such thing as anonymity, buddy ol pal!

There is such a thing as a public figure and such as thing as a private individual.

Pretending you don't understand the vast difference between those two categories to rationalize "posting home addresses, phone numbers, credit card information, and private email addresses with the intent that someone other than [you] will see it and steal, harass, and threaten death, rape, or worse" isn't going to stand up in court.

If I get so much as a single hostile phone call or email, I will retain the best attorneys in BC and we shall set about methodically confiscating every bit of wealth you inherited, earned, instamine-scammed, etc.

Should you make it as far as my LinkedIn page, you will find the majority of my peer group are extremely high-powered lawyers, so you can't really be shocked when we take everything you own in (partial) settlement for your stalking/doxing offenses.

Now, shall we get back on topic and discuss Dash's shady scumbag instamine/centralization/spamvertising, or do you want to insist on persisting in making the issue personal and accruing additional liability?

The choice is up to you, my precious portly cupcake, but I highly recommend picking the former option.

Aren't you curious why Alt36 stopped providing their customary monthly updates? Don't you want to talk about Amanda's (hilarious) new quest to bring /r/cryptocurrency into the Dash cargo cult? Is Dash Evolution's two year tardiness too sensitive of a topic for you to broach?