Quote from: hashcoinusa on February 23, 2018, 07:14:36 PM

Quote from: monsanto on February 23, 2018, 06:57:20 PM

Quote from: roflwaffle on February 23, 2018, 06:43:34 PM

Updated again

original list courtesy of levyashin, thanks to him.

Quote

100_tokenpar_com 0% fees (min payout: 0.03?)
Tent - Tiger - Dragon is taking 5% (min payout: 0.5)
Pool_borderline is taking 6% (and 0.3% for the developer of the pool) (min payout: 0.3)
lvl3pool is taking 6% (min payout: 0.25)
Phash is taking 7% (0.5% for the devs) (min payout: 0.3)
Semux_pool_party are taking 8% (and 0.5% for developer of pool) (min payout: 0.3)
cn_pool is taking around 10% (min payout: 0?)
Semuxpool_com and Semuxpool_com2 are taking 15% (developer of pool) (min payout: 0.1)
Mddsemuxpool - Mddsemuxpool2 are taking 15% (01 is donating % to dev) (min payout: 0.5)
General 01-02-03-04 are taking 18% (min payout: 0.5)
animal pool are taking 25% (min payout: 0) Must sign up at https://semux.info/pool

Please note you need to take # votes into consideration. For example, even though 100_token_par has lowest fees, it has 2x the votes of any other, so it pays lower than pools taking 25%

Quote from: roflwaffle on February 23, 2018, 06:08:11 PM

Quote from: Darthswan on February 23, 2018, 05:25:47 PM

Does anyone know that the developers have already fixed the problem that allowed forge blocks of 30% more to those validators that were closer to the top of the list? The idea was to be on the contrary, and this bug should have been fixed, I'm just wondering if the problem is fixed or not?) I want to know that I would not be mistaken with the choice of the validator, for which I will vote)

Its in code review now. Not live yet

Along with votes, is position in the top 100 another factor in pool payout? I didn't know there was this problem with more forged blocks going to validators that are closer to the top in votes (30% more blocks? Shocked

). I thought everyone in the top 100 had an equal chance.

Important for us is the ratio Payout / Semux . Delegate forging highest blocks with lowest vote and fee may be the ideal candidate.

Yes, for voters, the payout ratio is all that matters. Lowest vote and fee would be ideal candidate if position doesn't matter. Vote count and position are linked, but take a hypothetical situation where 1-100 validators are each separated by 1 vote each. So first spot is 30100, 2nd is 30099, 3rd 30098, etc to 30001. Not counting the fee, they should have almost identical payouts. Darthswan seemed to be saying higher position currently gets significantly more blocks because of a bug, which would work against this, but maybe I misunderstood.

Quote from: roflwaffle on February 23, 2018, 11:43:00 PM

Quote from: hashcoinusa link=topic=2159012.msg3092

Important for us is the ratio Payout / Semux . Delegate forging highest blocks with lowest vote and fee may be the ideal candidate.

I agree. But this number changes daily

as soon as i would post highest ratio, people would move votes and change the ratio. So youd have to do math at time of voting and move as appropriate. Best strat imo is to pick 3 of the lowest voted ones and split amongst them. If they get into like top 15 validators, move to a different one

Sounds like trying to measure the best validator payouts is like quantum mechanics.. can't get too precise a measurement without disturbing the system Wink