Quote from: quickmaffs on February 26, 2018, 03:04:35 AM

Quote from: RHavar on February 26, 2018, 01:31:54 AM

Quote from: quickmaffs on February 26, 2018, 12:44:55 AM

That's a bold faced lie.

You were the first investor because you knew when it was launching and originally received 10% dilution fees from everyone.

I was certainly an early investor, but I don't see how that changes anything -- especially on account that Daniel reimbursed everyone for the 10% dilution fees out of pocket. Anyway, my net profit/loss from dilution fees is pretty negligible. Not sure exactly, but I suspect it's < 1% of my investing loss (which with hindsight my investment has been the single biggest financial mistake of my life Tongue

) But I'm not going to complain, I knew the risks and based on the current volumes it's seems pretty likely the site will get out of the red in the next 6 months (in fact, I've recently seen it in positive profit briefly twice so far during the crazy whale action).

Regardless, I really don't know what more you expect. The site is already running with no commissions, did a pretty big refund to investors and lowered the worst-case kelly. If you're not prepared to absorb (a lot of) variance, don't join the bankroll.

It shows that you lied. Doesn't matter if it you claim it was negligible or not. Don't claim that you had the same risk and playing level as everyone else when you didn't.

What more can we expect? That you don't lie.

sorry I dont understand what you mean. please be so kind and explain why you think that RHavar did not have same risk or had less risk than other Investors?

thx