Quote from: TwitchySeal on February 28, 2018, 02:10:38 AM

Quote from: game-protect on February 28, 2018, 01:40:16 AM

Quote from: XarXymtroa on February 28, 2018, 12:01:16 AM

Quote from: game-protect on February 27, 2018, 10:06:18 PM

Quote from: Japinat on February 27, 2018, 05:38:08 AM

Hi OP, are the scam accusations already resolve or not yet?
I just want to ask because I am constantly playing with your site, but I don't really play with a big amount so your reputation here is not
something I am afraid of.

The publicly proven Bitcasino scam + Sportsbet scam have the scam tactic to let everyone in (deposit) and then unjustifiably demand KYC proceedings based on not specified accusations for withdrawals and false and misleading in reference to a non-existent so called regulator in Curacao!

This is of course absolute nonsense, because if you are obligated by a regulator to do KYC proceedings, then you have of course to do it as well with deposits, if they exceed a certain amount or are suspicious. Roll Eyes

Curiously deposits are never suspicious!

When asked for your fantasy regulator, you are of course not able to deliver:

Quote from: TwitchySeal on September 18, 2017, 05:51:26 PM

Quote from: bitcasino.io on September 18, 2017, 12:50:58 PM

players are obviously well within their rights to go to our regulator if they prefer.

Cheers,
Bitcasino.io

Is there any record of a player going to your regulator (curacao) and getting any sort of decision...or even response? (not just for your site, for any site they license)

Is there any public record of the actual regulations you have agreed to follow? Are there any that are put in place to protect players?

From what I can tell, Curacao basically requires a fee to be paid in exchange for a "license" - which allows you to open a bank account. I've never heard of them even once step in to protect a player. I have seen casinos use the excuse "we have to keep your money/see your ID because of our regulators..." plenty of times though.
(Obv I don't buy it)

There are surely cases where players try to scam a casino and KYC is justified. But their blatant lie about a non-existent regulator at least indicates that they also lie about your not specified accusations when blocking an account balance as they did here Bitcasino.io victim scams Game Protect for 20 BTC = $300,000!

You understand that no one is reading this cluster of garbage, don't you?

Should I make a poll to check how many % read it?

And thereafter a poll how many % of those who read it understood it?

You should go through all your posts and calculate how many questions and/or statements you've responded to with more questions rather than answers or confirmations/denials.

Unfortunately, I have not the time to calculate how many of my questions are still unanswered! Could you do it?