Quote from: ibminer on February 28, 2018, 04:28:59 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 28, 2018, 04:05:01 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 28, 2018, 04:03:20 PM

Looking at the terms of the contract, I dont see any reason why aTriz should be able to back out of paying alia.

Other than the amount that was paid upfront, I think the same. Although the input from others is welcome.

I have to assume aTriz is referring to something with his post... but I agree, it seems like the contract, as posted, should not hold aTriz accountable to continue payments.

Not really, no. He's addressing the exact question, and his response is "Nope, I don't that was in the contract". In other words: The case if alia gets a negative rating is/was not covered by the contract.

Quote from: ibminer on February 28, 2018, 04:28:59 PM

Still not sure why one would agree to a 5 month upfront payment in this situation. Seems like quite a risk for a user with no real prior history who has only been on the forum 1 month.

Indeed. When I was informed of the contract, I couldn't even remotely imagine a upfront 5 month payment. To get an answer from him on this, you're going to have to wait several hours though.