Quote from: OgNasty on February 28, 2018, 08:07:09 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 28, 2018, 08:02:41 PM

Quote from: MadZ on February 28, 2018, 07:22:32 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 28, 2018, 04:05:01 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 28, 2018, 04:03:20 PM

Looking at the terms of the contract, I dont see any reason why aTriz should be able to back out of paying alia.

Other than the amount that was paid upfront, I think the same. Although the input from others is welcome.

The contract also states that all payments will be refunded to aTriz should she fail to reach Legendary member status by the third year. Assuming people wake up and stop handing her free merit (21% of her merit comes from just one user, nullius), I doubt she will be able to meet this requirement.

Unless she makes a miraculous recovery out of this, she will very unlikely make it. However, that would still take too long for aTriz to get his money back. Additionally, I think that it implies that he continues sending her money until that time.

Interesting take. So aTriz will have to continue paying a scammer, knowing he won't get his funds back because he agreed to an awful contract? I guess feeling that way, you'd probably leave him negative trust if he refused to honor these payments?

En garde.

Quote from: ibminer on February 28, 2018, 05:46:18 PM

I don't think he's obligated to pay. He entered into the contract thinking someone was who they said they were and that person is clearly a liar who is misrepresenting themselves, so IMO the contract could be void just based on the fact it was created under false pretenses. I'd also add that standard public policies amongst the community has generally been that red trust == removal from signature campaigns which I believe adds further reasoning.