Quote from: LoyceV on March 01, 2018, 06:44:50 AM

Quote from: aTriz on March 01, 2018, 04:01:54 AM

Since I'm trapped in this deal, and I have a feeling that certain members will neg me if I back out of this contract, I've told alia to take of the alu signature and she can do whatever with it.

I'll still be making payments though, monthly.

1.1 down the drain...

Why didn't you make her put the big red scammer tag as signature?

You've been offered several ways out of this: alia has broken the maximum number of posts per month, broke the implied "good behaviour", and you could have offered a signature that won't fit ~~her~~ his account.
The contract doesn't even state a payment address, next thing you'll know he'll claim you didn't pay after you paid.

Funding this scammer is bad, ignoring is the right thing. And alia, while you keep saying you expect to be cleared in a year, you're only digging a deeper hole trying to extort aTriz. I expected you to reach -512 in a year, I now expect it within 2 days. ^{Where's Vod?}

Quote

Edit - I don't think certain members will care about the small details like going over 100 posts. I'll get negged no matter how I leave the contract and my reputation is worth a lot more than 1.1 btc.

Do you have anyone specific in mind? The 100 post limit has clearly been broken. Yes, it's a loophole to get out of the contract, but by common standards on Bitcointalk, alia broke the spirit of the contract by being an alt of a known scammer!

1. Contracts don't have a spirit
2. >100 is okay, <30 is not
3. Good behaviour was not stated nor implied
4. I have not even hit 100 posts in March (the first month of the contract)