Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 03:32:37 AM

Quote from: nullius on March 02, 2018, 03:14:03 AM

All within the same thread:

Quote from: alia on March 01, 2018, 02:03:10 PM

the script usually works 9/10 times or more

Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 01:32:54 AM

the script fails 9/10 times

Pfft, numbers? Who cares?

Quote from: alia on March 01, 2018, 11:24:03 PM

I'm really not interested in the mathematical mumbo jumbo...

Latest snapshot:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180302031007/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3044369.0;all

(Thanks to suchmoon for having caught that. Oops.)

@RGBKey, I seek your expertise for a gambling newbie question: Is it mathematically possible to write a gambling script which loses 90% of the time on a site with a 1% house edge?

If not, Alia is scamming! (Also, if so, Alia was scamming!)

Anecdotal/empirical evidence

Anecdotal/empirical evidence, says the individual who claims that the evidence of 20 gambling runs of your script would override the laws of mathematics. (As RGBKey calculated, you would have a 29.4% chance of proof by blind luck.)

Or do your words anecdotal/empirical evidence refer to something else? Its a bit ambiguous; and you have a recent history of word-conflation and patent self-contradiction to the point of nonsense:

Quote from: nullius on March 02, 2018, 04:15:29 AM

Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 03:33:29 AM

Typo I meant wins 9/10 times

That makes no sense in the context:

Quote from: alia (what she alleges she meant to say) on March 02, 2018, 01:32:54 AM

2) Since the script wins 9/10 times, I don't want to lose my coin. I will never use the script on significant amounts of money, unless it's for investors

This makes sense in the context:

Quote from: alia (what she actually said) on March 02, 2018, 01:32:54 AM

2) Since the script fails 9/10 times, I don't want to lose my coin. I will never use the script on significant amounts of money, unless it's for investors

So maybe add to this:

Quote from: alia on March 01, 2018, 11:24:03 PM

I'm really not interested in the mathematical mumbo jumbo...

...also this:

Quote from: alia (evidently) on March 01, 2018, 11:24:03 PM

I'm really not interested in the reading comprehension mumbo jumbo...

Latest snapshot:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180302042930/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3044369.0;all

Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 04:02:24 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on March 02, 2018, 04:01:25 AM

A one-way call might be one in which you and your brother would be on camera, and the forum member calling you would not be on camera, right?

The only verification of identity (or attempt to accomplish such) would be for you to answer various questions (and show various things, perhaps?) in a live kind of format.

At this point, do you really believe that any attempt at video verification process would even be useful to clarify anything in your favor, because there seems to be so much damning information out there about you that pretty much establishes that you could not be who you claim to be (innocent 19 year old college girl with a 15 year old brother living under the same roof). You just seem to come off as way too sophisticated and worldly experienced to be able to also fit the innocent girl status.

If I'm sophisticated and have lots of worldly experience, that makes me 15 y/o boy and not a 19 y/o girl. Best. Logic.

Yes, that is EXACTLY the kind of Skype call I want.

Alia, I hate to tell you this, but Im probably the only user on this forum who still gives so much as three damns about whether you are favours, or favours big sister.

I do still want to resolve that. Not sure how. Wont expend too much effort on my own part; to use a concept you understand (from econ classand otherwise), what incentive do I have? But if youre really a 19-year-old girl rather than an all-around lying sack of shit with external plumbing, I dont want to leave you in some Kafkaesque situation where you cant prove youre not your scamming little bro. Call it the principle of the matter.

Not going to help you with the mathematically impossible gambling script or your flip-flops there. Obviously.