Quote from: nullius on March 02, 2018, 04:54:56 AM

Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 04:51:51 AM

Quote from: nullius on March 02, 2018, 04:51:02 AM

Quote from: actmyname on March 02, 2018, 04:43:09 AM

Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 03:32:37 AM

Anecdotal/empirical evidence

Which is insubstantial when verifying the success of a script.

I can run a script 2 times, get a positive profit on the second run and claim a 100% chance of success.

My sample size contains only that very last one. It's anecdotal evidence.

Now, Im confused (per my above post). Usually, when somebody in such a context calls out anecdotal evidence, its a criticism. Thus, my assumption that she was referring to something which I put forth. Her statement was ambiguous in the context.

Whereas if she was referring to her purported attempt to empirically disprove the laws of mathematicswell, RGBKey already calculated that she would have a 29.4% probability of meeting all her stated proof criteria by blind luck. And as I noted, she was only risking a total of 0.00004 BTC, plus her promise to abandon a useless user account here.

29.4% probability of success, little to no downside riskwhat an empirical proof!

The downside isn't my money. It's my rep. If the script doesn't work I'll admit I'm a scammer and fuck off forever.

What rep?

Your rep here is deeply in the negative. You have less than nothing to lose in terms of reputation!

Oh well, I can extend the 10 days to 100 days, wouldn't make much of a difference.