Quote from: Quickseller on March 03, 2018, 02:54:23 AM

Quote from: nullius on March 02, 2018, 11:32:53 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on March 02, 2018, 11:13:57 PM

I wonder if aTriz is able to produce a script of any kind that he was vouching for...

I think it was shaken out rather clearly in those threads that aTriz doesnt have any scripting ability worth speaking of.

Maybe I was not clear.

alia allegedly sent aTriz some kind of gambling script for him to test and vouch for. aTriz claimed to test this $10,000 gambling script with faucet money for 10 minutes and vouched for it. In order for aTriz to test this script, alia would have had to have sent the script to him. I am curious to know if aTriz is able to produce/show the script that alia sent him.

According to the OP, alia is using the handle 'makealiagreatagain' on bustabit, however a review of the betting history on that account only shows four bets made, even though the OP claims to have run the script for two days.

I am willing to say there is a fairly decent chance that alia is not running a script, especially considering all of alia's bets appears to be 'all in' bets.

If alia is not currently using a script, then maybe there was never any kind of script in the first place.

Interesting question. It well may be the case that no script is being run now; and at best, the only evidence we have of a script now being run is Alias unsupported word.

However, I seriously doubt that Alias script be wholly non-existent. Perforce, something must have been on-hand to provide to paying ~~marks~~ customers. It simply would not do, if the script-selling ~~scam~~ business had to close down early due to paying customers complaining of having received nothing at all.

As for the question of aTriz disclosing his copy of the putative script, I think that raises a far stickier issue than that of the signature ad contract. I am not familiar with the situation, other than whats been discussed in public threads; but given Alias secretiveness about that script, I presume that it must have been provided to him under some sort of confidentiality terms.

For an analogy, consider PMs which Alia sent to me. I have publicly disclosed a few of those; but I only did so when reasonably required for an investigative or otherwise evidentiary purpose, and I minimized the disclosures as much as practicable. Even after what has happened to date, I would not dump out all the PMs in public. That has nothing to do with my opinion of Alia, and everything to do with my principles about PMs.

If the script were reasonably required for an investigative purpose, then I would urge aTriz to disclose it. But I see no such need here.

What Alia claims the script to do is mathematically impossible; and we dont need to see the script for that to be proved. By analogy, suppose that somebody disclosed to aTriz under strict NDA a design for a perpetual motion machine, or a recursive compressor. Would it be required that aTriz violate the NDA for the purpose of publicly proving that the thing is bunkum? (Obviously, that is a rhetorical question.)

I can think of some circumstances under which such a disclosure might be required, for other purposes; e.g., if an investigator were comparing gambling scripts sold by allegedly different people for the purpose of linking identities, identifying the real authors of such scripts, etc. That question is beyond the scope of yours.

Parenthetically, I note that you claimed that the signature ad contract was still valid and binding on aTriz. Whereas that agreement was clearly voidable. Here, you are clearly setting the stage for some suggestion that aTriz actually disclose the scriptpredictably followed by pressure on him to disclose the script, and accusations that hes protecting a scammer if he doesnt cough it up. Why the switcheroo, with you here insinuating that agreements can be freely ignored? Not that Im surprised to see this level of inconsistency from you.

Quote from: Quickseller on March 03, 2018, 03:19:04 AM

Until aTriz can prove otherwise, it appears that aTriz was vouching for a script that didn't even exist

Oh, here we go! I wrote the above prediction, hit Preview, and was informed in red letters that another post had been madethis one. Here, you are clearly setting the stage for some suggestion that aTriz actually disclose the scriptpredictably followed by pressure on him to disclose the script, and accusations that hes protecting a scammer if he doesnt cough it up. Well, you dont wait long building these things up, now do you?