Quote from: marlboroza on March 03, 2018, 06:34:23 PM

Quote from: nullius on March 03, 2018, 06:02:33 PM

Quote from: RGBKey on March 03, 2018, 05:43:18 PM

I'll offer to audit this script.

I myself will vouch for RGBKeys technical competence for performing such an audit.

Why?

Quote from: Astargath on March 03, 2018, 06:39:16 PM

Quote from: RGBKey on March 03, 2018, 05:43:18 PM

I'll offer to audit this script.

I mean, do we really need to?

Because:

Quote from: nullius on March 03, 2018, 06:02:33 PM

Another idea: Private audit.

Alia, you yourself made this an issue:

Quote from: alia on March 02, 2018, 10:59:09 PM

Like I said, many, many times... not everything has to be 100% math based. My aim is to make profit for people, and I am doing it. That is my end goal. Not to fit your stupid equations (which are not even relevant since you don't know the intricacies of how my script works)

If your ultimate answer is that your critics lack sufficient knowledge to judge your script because they havent seen it, then it is incumbent on you to grant such knowledge.

As for this quite reasonable question:

Quote from: marlboroza on March 03, 2018, 06:34:23 PM

I am not sure why is so important to prove something which doesn't exist.

I already gave a reasonable answer:

Quote from: nullius on March 03, 2018, 06:02:33 PM

...perhaps a credible auditor may be interested in approaching this as a skeptical investigator. There do exist eminent scientists who make a hobby (or even a secondary career) out of investigating famous spoon-bending psychics, and the like. Their investigations are not jokes; they are serious and scientifically rigorous.

When drafting those words (before RGBKey posted his auditing offer), I had considered mentioning persons including RGBKey as potential auditors. I decided against it: I should not try to entangle anyone in such a task, unless that person is already willing to apply his technical competence to the task of being a fair and rigorous skeptical investigator. Not all scientific and engineering professionals would wish to deal with such a controversy. I am glad that RGBKey offered to do so, fully of his own accord.

I will note that the professional scientists who usually do such investigations of famous psychics, etc. are fair and scientifically rigorous in their investigations. Their own scientific reputations are on the line: They would not kill their own credibility by presuming any conclusion in advance, or by applying anything other than their usual scientific standards as they do elsewhere.

Quote from: suchmoon on March 03, 2018, 06:43:34 PM

I think the point is that it should be important for alia, who is claiming to be able to defy everything that you just said. And handing it over for an audit would be a much quicker way to do it that dragging this out for 100 days.

I fully expect alia to weasel out of this for some random reason.

I predict similarly. But I hope otherwise. Given how Alias ultimate answer has turned out to be that our stupid equations dont apply because we dont know the intricacies of her script, RGBKeys offer of an audit is a challenge: Put up, or shut up.