Quote from: mo on March 04, 2018, 07:36:24 AM

Quote from: tk808 on March 03, 2018, 05:20:13 PM

Quote from: Henry412 on March 03, 2018, 03:01:38 PM

As the distribution rules, I have a little suggestion.
1.We can be divided into 10 round distribution，each allocation asked everyone to a publicity on Twitter or Facebook, it can expand the popularity of NEV.
2.We can allocate NEV according to the length of the login time of the BTT forum, which can prevent the trumpet.
，

1) We will not be dividing the rounds into 10 rounds of distribution, the amount of work to filter that many puppet accounts would be extraordinary, and along with promotions via Twitter and Facebook. There would be a great boost in popularity, but at a heavy expense on the integrity of this entire coin. The principals of equality and egalitarianism would also be violated, why should individuals who promote on Twitter and Facebook be rewarded with a carrot on a stick for simply promoting the project; the DO approach of mass-marketing is short-sided, real tangible support will fail once the airdrops are over.

2) No allocation of Nevstakes will be given for login time on BTT fourms, even if that were so, there'd be no actual way of verifying login times in a legitimate fashion. We'd then be favoring those who've been on BTT for years, and all new-commers essentially get screwed.

Nevra is egalitarian, we aren't going to be favoring anyone based on any set of conditions. Within this framework, there will be those who seek to help the project, and will be awarded appropriately through the funds that are set-aside, not into the main distribution.

Most people have seen airdrops that require you to do a list of tasks and fake promotions, and almost all those airdrops end up as a failure. There's nothing that trumps a dedicated and willing community individuals and devs/creator behind a coin.

tk808 said good：There's nothing that trumps a dedicated and willing community individuals and devs/creator behind a coin. the value of a coin is dev constant efforts

I totally agree.If people are willing to participate, communicate spontaneously with devs,It will be better developed with devs.

And, I think UE is an important part of the purpose of development, and people who are enthusiastic about it could often give real experience feedback.