Quote from: Axcel-m on March 05, 2018, 03:08:43 PM

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 05, 2018, 02:41:23 PM

Quote from: Frank37 on March 05, 2018, 01:50:37 PM

Quote from: levyashin on March 05, 2018, 01:17:33 PM

Do you have a cap on private investors round or you can ge

Quote from: Makkara on March 05, 2018, 07:44:49 AM

Quote from: Korsakopf on March 05, 2018, 07:24:30 AM

I would like to know if Biotron has processes in place to prevent users from faking their own data. If the endresult is users selling their data directly to interested parties, i can imagine some users who will try to fake some data to appear more valuable to the interested parties.

similarly to the KYC process the data you provide will need to be verified before entering the system i assume, otherwise the whole concept fall.

I don't think they will use kyc similar thing for their system.

It probably limits their joiners.

I never would make a KYC.
Big companies already have too much data from me.
To connect the data with my person would be the end of privacy.

also I read in the wp:
Pseudonymisation
also takes place. It is a procedure whereby any identifying characteristics of data are
replaced with a value which prevents the individual from being directly identified.

But I have to read more to fully understand this part of the project ...

like people previously stated.

-every ico need now kyc to secure their place if some legal issues are upcoming later
-find friends to invest in a group, then only 1 person has to kyc
-go to exchange and buy after the tokens hit on it
-join bounties

if there are any and or, hope for airdrop

Especially for this project a KYC is ok for me. It is nothin illegal or an anonymous token.
And today there are nearly no ICOs without KYC

KYC has already bothered me a lot in past projects, simply because I did not know at the time its form of application and utility, but I see that it is a necessary discomfort for Investors for greater control and success of the Team and project