Quote from: aveon on March 05, 2018, 05:52:35 PM

Quote from: wissy on March 05, 2018, 05:17:09 PM

Quote from: belechau on March 05, 2018, 04:32:26 PM

Quote from: Axcel-m on March 05, 2018, 03:11:57 PM

Quote from: mig6r on March 05, 2018, 12:40:33 PM

Quote from: sambuki on March 03, 2018, 03:35:24 PM

Quote from: the_donald on March 03, 2018, 03:29:49 PM

Quote from: belechau on March 03, 2018, 03:24:19 PM

Quote from: Makkara on March 03, 2018, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on March 03, 2018, 10:39:58 AM

The Demo, the beta demo will starts after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing.

that is going to be available at some point after March, it said Q2

Very good that Repu already has something to present in Q2, is the most requested so far, will be a differential and so much for the project, and certainly something that will help eliminate many doubts about the functionality of the Platform and its possibilities of application

I would've hoped that they have a beta before the ICO to advertise better, but I'll take what I can get.

Agreed, beta before ICO will be better and not after it. Imo, when investors able to see something before investing their money is the most affordable thing in ICO's projects.

I always have a hard time to understand why teams would decide to not first build the beta and then go for the ICO, unless funds from the ICO might be critical to the development of the beta. Usually if you have a great product you should be better off having the beta ready during the ICO.

Sometimes there are more disadvantages to publish a beta or a klick dummy. If it is a realy complex product and a development with low effort is not possible it does not makes sense. The investors wont be happy about the result.

There is a lot of potential in the Work Team, they are struggling to reach partners who help them in their development, but the complexity of some features and the legal implications that can occur are really something to surpass

I really hope they researched all the spectres of releasing a platform like this and are backed with some layers knowledge to avoid all the negative sides of running an ICO like that. They really need to cover everything before the official start.

The only thing is to concentrate on the most crucial aspects so that the project launch is smooth and errorless. You don't even need all that bunch of features to initially start the project. The better idea is to focus narrower but in depth

exactly, get a working core prototype and move on as we progress